Monday, March 23, 2009

Focus and Context: The Hub of Leadership

Focus and Context: The Hub of Leadership
By Jim Clemmer

Successful leaders spend a lot of time creating the identity of the organization what our values are, what our mission is, what our purpose is, how we are going to act together as one. Those are agreements of how we are going to be together. You can actually get a whole team or a whole group to hold one another accountable. The team self-regulates and members call each other in a much more immediate way than a leader can ever do. Margaret Wheatley, President of The Berkana Institute, A Global Charitable Leadership Foundation

It wasn't by accident that we chose to arrange the timeless leadership principles in the shape of wheel. Of all the principles, there is one that is central, one from which the others emanate, much as spokes radiate from the hub of a wheel. That core principle, Focus and Context, consists of three interrelated parts, which are defined by the answers to three key questions:

1.Where are we going (the vision or picture of our preferred future or outcome)?

2.What do we believe in (our guiding values or principles)?

3.Why do we exist (our reason for being, mission, or purpose)?

These questions are about as simple as I can make them. And this is important, because they can become overly complicated...So I usually try to reduce Focus and Context to its key components, using these terms: Vision, Values, and Purpose.

Microsoft chairman Bill Gates kept a clear and consistent focus for his company as it pioneered a new industry. He found that maintaining focus is a key to success. You should understand your circle of competence and spend your time and energy there...I've learned that only through focus can you do world-class things, no matter how capable you are.

Focus and Context is where the contrast between management and leadership is possibly at its sharpest. It is the very beginning point of strong leadership. Consider, for example, all the people you know well, and identify those you think of as being strong leaders. What characteristics do they share? Chances are they don't just wait for things to happen to them; they go and make things happen. They don't just follow the crowd; they blaze their own trail. They don't wait to be told what to do; they do what needs to be done. Leaders seldom waffle or vacillate. They are purposeful and deliberate.

Frederick Smith, Chairman and CEO of FedEx, created a whole new industry when he began his company in 1973. Smith's idea of locating a central hub in Memphis, Tennessee, to provide overnight courier service across the U.S. was a radical departure from traditional thinking so radical, in fact, that when he outlined the concept in a paper at business school, his professor gave him a C. (The idea was too unworkable, he said.) Smith's long and highly successful career as both a start-up entrepreneur and operating CEO (a very rare combination) has led him to conclude, The primary task of leadership is to communicate the vision and the values of an organization. Second, leaders must win support for the vision and the values they articulate. And third, leaders have to reinforce the vision and the values. That's probably the most difficult task, and it's where most organizations fall apart.

Excerpted from Jim's bestseller, The Leader's Digest: Timeless Principles for Team and Organization Success. View the book's unique format and content, Introduction and Chapter One, and feedback at http://www.theleadersdigest.com This book is a companion book to Growing the Distance: Timeless Principles for Personal, Career, and Family Success. Jim Clemmer is an internationally acclaimed keynote speaker, workshop/retreat leader, and management team developer on leadership, change, customer focus, culture, teams, and personal growth. His web site is http://www.clemmer.net/articles

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=JimClemmer
http://EzineArticles.com/?Focus-and-Context:-The-Hub-of-Leadership&id=241207

Leading a Spiritual Workplace Nu Leadership Series

Leading a Spiritual Workplace - Nu Leadership Series
By Daryl Green

Choosing one's leaders is an affirmation that the person making the choice has inherent worth. Linda Chavez

Lets explore more of the emerging needs of the current workforce. Many corporations would prefer to stay away from religious values or connotations. However, many workers desire a more spiritual workplace. Ashar and Lane-Maher, authors of Success and Spirituality in the New Business Paradigm, maintain that the workplace has an aspiration for something more than employment. Some scholars call this need spirituality. Is this concept new? Pascarella, author of Christ Centered Leadership, argues that Americans have always tried to maintain a religious aspect of living. He calls this phenomenon civil religion. It is characterized by individuals feeling good about themselves and carrying a sense of godliness in their living. In reality, this only provides a self serving mission.

Unfortunately, faddish spirituality falls short of any real substance. Its like eating cake everyday for a meal. Although it tastes good and may fill you up for a minute, it wont keep you satisfied for long. However, many people seek this aspect of goodness, however. Often, this pursuit becomes self serving practice. Understanding this dynamic in employee development may give an organization a better competitive advantage in the marketplace. Therefore, strategy leaders do not overlook the current desire of employees for a more meaningful workplace (namely, a more spiritual workplace).

References:

Ashar, H. & Lane-Maher, M. (2004). Success and spirituality in the new business paradigm. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(3), 249-260.

Pascarella, P. (1999). Christ Centered Leadership. Rocklin, CA: Prima Publishing.

2006 by Daryl D. Green

Daryl D. Green has published over 100 articles in the field of decision-making (personal and organizational), leadership, and organizational behavior. Mr. Green is also the author of two acclaimed books, Awakening the Talents Within and My Cup Runneth Over. He is a columnist, lecturer, professor, and management consultant. Mr. Green has a BS in engineering and a MA in organizational management. Currently, he is a doctoral degree in strategic leadership. For more information,visit his website at http://www.darylgreen.org

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=DarylGreen
http://EzineArticles.com/?Leading-a-Spiritual-Workplace---Nu-Leadership-Series&id=248265

Leadership Art

Leadership Art
By Sharon White

The book was written around 4th century BC. However, for each generation ever since it appears to be important and valuable. The Art of War teaches how to control and how to lead people in war in the simple words, yet with the use of symbols.

The main concept of The Art of War is the leadership and its significance in control and managing. Leader must discipline and direct. In the war according to Sun Tzu the leader only could win or loose the battle. And the power and the number of the army didnt make a difference to him. It becomes obvious from his book that he was a strict and demanding leader, whom army had to obey and follow his commands without questioning. In the war Sun Tzu was the authority. However, Sun Tzu did allow himself to be understanding and supportive to his army. The dignity and wisdom were a different side of his leadership style. At the same time he said that the devoted and loving leader is a loss for the army, as people follow him in disasters.

Sun Tzu was a wise leader and he emphasized the need to be always prepared, but yet try escaping battles if possible. His main idea was to plan and make strategies to limit the number of possible losses. As a wise leader and a human being he valued the human life. He obviously realized that in every battle soldiers will die, therefore he avoided battles if possible. Sun Tzu believed that the physical strength and numerical advantage did not make a difference in a battle. The army with the strong leader, even if the enemy is greater in quantity, can always win the battle if the right strategies are applied. His idea and philosophical view was that anything can be achieved and anything can be possible in the war if the right leader is in command and if the right strategies are implemented. The most important thing he brought up is the correct use of the resources and the correct combination of them. In The Art of War the golden mean is trying to be achieved in everything- in the number of troops, in the warriors abilities, in the leaders attitude and behavior. And only the necessity of having a wise leader was unconditional and absolutely a must.

Sun Tzu managed to organize all the principles and the rules of the war, but as it appears, they could be used not only in the actual war itself but in the corporate war as well. The strategy techniques and the necessity of its implementation are widely used in business world today.

The article was produced by the member of masterpapers.com. Sharon White has many years of a vast experience in freelance writing, term papers writing and essay writing consulting. Feel free to send her your inquiries at Dissertation Writing.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=SharonWhite
http://EzineArticles.com/?Leadership-Art&id=259285

Sunday, March 22, 2009

The Five Levels of Leadership

The Five Levels of Leadership
By Nick Pollice

Becoming an effective leader is a lot like being in the stock market. You don't make your fortune in a day; you make it daily, a little bit at a time. What matters most is what you do day after day, over the long haul. The secret to leadership success is investing in your leadership development, much like letting your assets compound. The final result is Leadership Growth over time.

Leaders aren't born; their made. The process of leadership is long, complicated and has made elements. Respect, dignity, discipline, people skills, vision, emotional strength, opportunity, preparedness and experience are just some of the intangible elements which come into play when talking leadership.

We can, over a period of time, increase our leadership potential if we can understand and accept the five levels of leadership. They are:

Level One - Leadership From Position

This is the basic level of leadership. At this level people follow you because they have to. Your ability to lead people is totally geared to your position and does not exceed beyond the lines of your job description or the authority granted to you by the company and your boss. Your security with the company is based on title and position, not talent.

To be an effective leader at this level know your job, be prepared to accept responsibility, exercise authority with caution, assess the strengths and short comings of your people, do more than what is expected and challenge people with interesting and tough assignments.

It is important that we recognize that Positional Level is the doorway to leadership and every successful leader must pass through this doorway.

Level Two - Leadership From Respect

At the respect level of leadership people follow you because they want to. The core of Leadership From Respect is that people want to know that you care, before they care about what you know. People see you as a professional partner, sharing the same goals and the same challenges along the way. Leadership will flourish at the respect because respect will breed lasting trusted professional relationships and that, in turn will provided the basis for effective leadership.

To be effective at the respect level, possess a genuine concern for your people. It is important that you see life through their eyes. Deal with wisely with difficult people and make employees successful by setting them up for success.

Since leadership from respect is built on professional relationships, it forms the foundation for leadership success.

Level Three - Leadership From Results

People follow you because of what you have done for the company. People admire you for your accomplishments and respect your tenacity. At this point leadership becomes fun. Going to work is fun, work related challenges are seen to be opportunities for a more stable work environment and all tasks have a purpose in the minds of the employees. Good things happen at the results level. Making profit, low employee turnover, higher employee morale and solving problems with ease are some of the items that become evident at this level.

To be an effective leader at this level be prepared to initiate and accept responsibility for growth by developing a purpose and seeing it through to completion. Develop accountability for results, beginning with yourself and ending with your people. Make the difficult decisions that will result in positive long term gains while championing change as a change agent and understanding the process of change.

Leadership from results is built on admiration for the leader.

Level Four - Leadership From People Development

People follow you because of what you have done for them. It is a leader's responsibility to develop their people to do the work that is expected to contribute future growth opportunities to the company and the people who serve it. People are loyal to you because they see first hand personal growth opportunities for them as well as, the company. Leadership success is underscored by a win - win scenario and a high commitment to success.

To be effective at this level place a priority on developing people. Focus your attention on the fact that people are your most valuable asset and your leadership success will depend on your ability to surround yourself with an inner core of competent people who compliment your leadership style and goals.

Leadership from people development is built on loyalty.

Level Five - Leadership From Mentorship

People follow you because they respect you. As a leader you are bigger than life and your success is shown through a life of accomplishments. People seek you out after you have left the company because you have left an indelible mark on the organization and the employees. Although less than five per cent of all leaders will get to this level of leadership (John Mayberry from Dofasco, Darek Nowakowski from Con Agra and Clare Proctor from E.D. Smith come to mind) it is a level worth striving for.

In summary, everyone can become a better leader. It is important to keep in mind that the higher you go up the leadership scale, the longer it takes to accomplish results, the higher the commitment will be and it is imperative that we know what level we are on with our people and the company.

Nick Pollice has been a member of the Canadian Management Centre faculty since 1992, having assisted over 1000 employees, from over 100 public- and private-sector North American organizations. Nick specializes in sales management seminars and sales sanagement courses for more information

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=NickPollice
http://EzineArticles.com/?The-Five-Levels-of-Leadership&id=208291

How to Lead Employees in a Postmodern Culture Nu Leadership Series

How to Lead Employees in a Postmodern Culture - Nu Leadership Series
By Daryl Green

A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.
Dwight D. Eisenhower

Leader, you think youve got it under control. Do you really? Todays media heavily influences our organizational values. Please now carefully follow my trail and watch your step. Recently, the Oscars, labeled the greatest showcase of entertainment, highlighted several cultural shifts. Some Oscar winners included Crash (best picture) and Brokeback Mountain (several Oscars). Crash focused on racial and social prejudices while Brokeback Mountain depicted a homosexual relationship. TransAmerica, a story of a conservative trans-sexual, was also spotlighted. The causal observer may not care; however, organizational leaders shouldnt ignore these cultural implications.

Lets explore leader-follower value systems. Leaders inspire followers under cultural constraints. Postmodernism, a 20th century term, focuses on a multi-cultural movement that rejects absolute truths (pluralism), universal stories, and traditional concepts like religion. Many bosses ignore the influence of pop-culture on their organizations. They feel protected because they exist in a traditional, controlled environment. However, postmodernism attacks the very heart of tradition.

Lets analyze a traditional institution such as the church and the effect of Postmodernism on it. Kelm, author of Understanding and Addressing a Postmodern Culture, argues that post-Christian culture influences are far-reaching. For example, Christians are often making value decisions on the basis of intuition and reasoning rather than using a biblical framework.

Therefore, management should not get too comfortable in believing they are exempt from these cultural influences. What, then, are the organizational impacts? Postmodernism has employees, who are more cynical and pessimistic, debating whats right. Todays leaders shouldnt ignore this postmodern movement and its value consequences in organizations. Leaders should get to know their employees personally, understand cultural changes, and help their organizations adjust. Start today!

References:
CNN. (2006). Best picture goes to gritty drama Crash. Received on March 6, 2006 on http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Movies/03/05/oscar.advancer/index.html

Kelm, P. (January 21, 1999). Understanding and Addressing a Postmodern Culture. Presented to the Board for Parish Services. Wikipedia.org (2006). Book Review on Revolution. Received on February 28, 2006 on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism#Thedevelopmentofpostmodernism.

Wren, D. (1994). The Evolution of Management Thought. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

2006 by Daryl D. Green

Daryl D. Green has published over 100 articles in the field of decision-making (personal and organizational), leadership, and organizational behavior. Mr. Green is also the author of two acclaimed books, Awakening the Talents Within and My Cup Runneth Over. He is a columnist, lecturer, professor, and management consultant. Mr. Green has a BS in engineering and a MA in organizational management. Currently, he is a doctoral degree in strategic leadership. For more information,visit his website at http://www.darylgreen.org.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=DarylGreen
http://EzineArticles.com/?How-to-Lead-Employees-in-a-Postmodern-Culture---Nu-Leadership-Series&id=219125

Friday, February 27, 2009

Leadership and Change in a Holographic Universe

Leadership and Change in a Holographic Universe
By Soni Pitts

Have you ever noticed that since the early part of the 20th century, nearly every new scientific theory manages to sound more and more like the same sort of metaphysical philosophies science once dismissed? Well, it's happening again and this time our views on the structure of the universe, the power of human consciousness and even the nature of reality itself are being challenged by a startling new finding: that many hard to explain events and scientific puzzles become suddenly clear and easily understood if we consider that everything we see and experience around us is not in fact a physical reality, but rather our own interpretation of an infinitely large, dynamic and multidimensional hologram, constructed by and interpreted through our own consciousness.

Most people are familiar with the concept of a graphic hologram - an image imprinted on a special film that, when illuminated with a certain type of laser, projects a 3-dimensional picture that you can view from any angle. One of the most fascinating features of holograms is that if you cut the original film into pieces, each snippet will still project a complete and unblemished version of the original image. In other words, because of the unique structure of a hologram, no matter how small you divide it each piece contains all the information of the whole.

So what does the possibility of a holographic universe have to do with leadership and change? Simply this - that the nature of a holographic universe is the same as that of a holographic image, only on an infinitely larger and more complex scale. Quite literally, in a holographic universe every person, every dust mote, every particle contains all the information of the whole universe within itself. Even more intriguing is the prospect that we (our combined consciousness) almost certainly have a hand in, if we are not entirely responsible for, creating what we perceive as reality around us.

There are three important implications about the nature of reality, and for creating change in that reality, that we can draw from the theory of the holographic Universe:

The entirety of the whole exists within each part

This aspect of living in a holographic universe has been expressed for centuries in a single, eloquent word - nemaste (literally, the divine in me recognizes and salutes the divine in you). This belief, that God-nature is not only at the core of our being but also expressed through us, may now have grounding in sound scientific theory. If we are indeed part of a holographic universe, then each of us contains all of the information, all of the aspects and all of the power contained in the whole, on a smaller and less complex scale. We would be, literally, created in the image of All That Is.

In fact, we would be miniature holograms in nature as well. Some studies on human consciousness and the way in which the brain and body functions support this. In one experiment, doctors found that no matter what parts of rats' brains were removed, the researchers could not cut out memories of how to do previously learned tasks, suggesting that the brain stores information holographically and that all parts contain the necessary information to reconstruct the whole. Likewise, emotion, feelings and even memory have been found to originate throughout the body, rather than emanating from a single point or source, and extend well beyond the confines of the physical body - far enough, according to some studies, to have effected measurable change in nearby participants.

If consciousness creates the physical world, then a change in consciousness can change the physical world

While this has been accepted as philosophical and spiritual fact for eons, scientific backing for this idea has only recently begun to appear. If the consciousness can deeply and sincerely alter its own perception or reality, the surrounding reality would change to match it. This in turn supports the concept that we are all connected in some way beyond the material universe. If the material universe is merely a holographic construct of our consciousness, then the appearance of physical existence and the individuality of that existence is simply part of that illusion, one our consciousness must reside outside of.

In fact, these aspects of holographic reality provide stunningly elegant explanations for quite a few hard-to-explain events, like spontaneous healing, action at a distance and the placebo effect. The reality we see can change dramatically depending on our understanding of it, and our external connectedness outside of the physical universe means that there really is no such thing as true distance, in either time or space, but merely the illusion of such created by our limited point of view.

The whole is an emergent phenomenon of the parts

An emergent phenomenon is a behavior or state of being that is greater than the sum of its parts, yet that reflects the nature of those parts. For example, life is an emergent phenomenon; the unique quality that we call life is determined to a great extent by the nature of its constituents, and yet life is far more than simply the sum of the atoms and molecules that comprise it.

Likewise, a holographic image is made up of and is determined by the nature of the light that was used to create it. Change the angle of that light or the source of that image and you get an entirely different picture. In a holographic universe, not only would we (the constituents) reflect the nature of the universe, but the nature of the universe would also be a reflection of us. Therefore, if we changed the nature of our own reality, it would alter the nature of reality around us.

Of course, the whole influences the part to a greater degree than the part can influence the whole, which is why you cannot fly when you jump off the Empire State Building no matter how sincerely you believe you can. Experts in probability theory call the propensity for more likely alternatives to merge together and grow stronger, while less likely alternatives die out, hardiness. They propose that this action explains why we all see the same reality despite the fact that experiments have shown that the physical nature of reality changes every time it is observed. Apparently, the harmonic resonance of the most probable outcomes amplifies their footprint in reality and drowns out individual sour notes to the contrary, creating a stable but continually evolving shared perception.

Those who would be leaders or change agents in a holographic reality must understand that meaningful leadership and lasting change cannot be imposed by surface actions, regardless of their intent. Instead, change and leadership ideals must be impressed into the surrounding reality, much like a seed crystal impresses its form on the surrounding crystallization matrix. This can only be done by embodying a complete and detailed representation of what we want the larger whole to look like, and thereby changing the very nature of the parts that make up the whole. If we can then help others do the same (which will be easier, since our own transformation and contact with others will begin to change their own perception of reality), the effect spreads exponentially.

Of course, religious and philosophical leaders have accepted the concept of reality as having these holographic aspects for eons. This belief is apparent across all ages and cultures - in Gandhi's exhortation to ...be the change you wish to see in the world, in the Bible's promise that what any two or more believers will agree on or ask for will be made so, in the Sufi belief that every breath we take destroys the old reality and creates the new, and that the physical world is merely an insubstantial movie created by the flickering image of this creation and destruction projected on the screen of our consciousness.

The implications for the nature of leadership and change in a holographic universe, both for us as individuals and for society as a whole, are quite simply breathtaking. And yet, at the same time, these startling new findings only confirm what spiritual teachings across the span of human time have always held to be true: that we are all connected outside of the illusion of the physical universe (which we create and alter to serve our needs), that we are all created in the image of God and possess the God-nature within us and that the only way to create real, lasting change is to completely alter our actions, thoughts and beliefs so that we actually begin to embody the change we wish to see on a deep, cellular level - to change reality by changing our conscious awareness and understanding of its very nature.

Science, society and our understanding of reality seem to have made a giant circle to approach their beginnings from behind, like the mythological snake eating its own tail. But before we agonize over the waste of time and energy that this represents, as some might do, perhaps we should consider that maybe the journey was the point. Sometimes you have to walk around the world to realize the beauty and value of your own backyard.

(c) Soni Pitts

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Soni Pitts is the Chief Visionary Butt-Kicker of SoniPitts.Com. She specializes in helping others reclaim soul proprietorship in their lives and to begin living the life their Creator always intended for them.

She is the author of the free e-book 50 Ways To Reach Your Goals and over 100 self-help and inspirational articles, as well as other products and resources designed to facilitate this process of personal growth and spiritual development.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=SoniPitts
http://EzineArticles.com/?Leadership-and-Change-in-a-Holographic-Universe&id=13065

Monday, January 12, 2009

Leadership an Art is it?

Leadership -an Art, is it?
By Ramesh Kumar Thiagarajan

Why not a science? why an art? it is because of the fact that there are no hard and fast rules, that is why Leadership is defined an art. Everyone has the right to create his own leadership style. The leadership style is mostly defined by the various factors to name a few the principles they follow, business ethics, interpersonal relationship. Let us see the key points that define a leader.

The most prominent principle of being a leader is to be a authentic leader. This is the most important principle or quality any leader should have. It is the most defining factor to be a leader. Authentic means you reflect and follow what you say and mean! In layman terms it is NOT saying something and doing something. The most obvious question that arises is why? why is Authenticity a defining factor? The sole reason is the fact that your credibility increases, your dependability increases. Please note that it does not mean that doing whatever you say irrespective of the consequences. What it means is you commit yourself to what you say! just in case you face problems, you acknowledge gracefully and checkout the alternative courses or corrective measures.

The second important principle is being people's man rather than the management's guy. Well, the managers out there might be after me! but the fact is that People first should be the rule. No matter what people come first than anything else. Because they are the building blocks over which the entire management rests! If they fail or grumble the company is at loss. In business terms you might want to calculate the loss of productive hours, poor quality output etc. Once these key principles are in place, the next important factor is the business ethics. It is hard to define business ethics, so in short it is all about cross the line. Trust me, you will know it when you are bound to cross it.

The next important aspect is the interpersonal relationship, how the leader deals with people around him? Here too there are no defined rules, because the rules are bound to change depending upon the person you are interacting with. Not every other person is the same, are they? So each one has to be handled differently depending upon their weakness and strengths. The leader builds upon the strengths of the individuals and helps them to strengthen the weakness. This concept of making them strengthen their weakness, plays a major role in their personal growth as well as the organization they work for. Most people disregard this aspect that once they are trained or shaped they might switch companies. Well, in that aspect that is a risk we need to take, for the evolution of the organization.

Some of the other key factors that are key for a leader are as follows:

The other important aspects in leading a team are to keep them informed periodically about the vision/path ahead of them. The prospects, the pitfalls, the irony everything has to be set out on the table, so that the team is aware of reality. In a sense this will help the team to adapt to reality and make changes as quickly as possible.

Making people realize that the limit for their potential and ideas is the sky. i.e the limits they define are illusions. Need to help them understand that whatever they envision can become reality once they start strengthening their vision.

Periodic feedback after a milestone or key achievement is mandatory. This does not include the corrective or immediate feedback, these have to be given then and there. The periodic feedback mostly concentrate on developing the team members strengths and strengthening their weaknesses. And most often bring back focus to what they want to achieve in their career. This is advantageous in two ways, i.e. the leader knows what is happening exactly and the team knows where they stand always!

The other most important aspect you might want to cultivate in your team is the maturity to see the problem and the person differently. i.e. whenever somebody complains or points out a problem it does not reflect on the person but on the solution proposed by the person. This is one of the major causes of confusion in any organization. This creates havoc within the teams, and most often lead to the splitting up of the team into sides, which is one of the least you want as a leader.

The leader should talk about only the current problem at hand, and forget the previous recurrences when resolving a issue. This gives the team the clarity and focus to solve the problem at hand, rather than looking back what went wrong last time and who to blame this time.

One of the important factor that you might want to cultivate in your team is the frankness to accept when something is wrong, even if it is the leader! This openness in the team helps to build a open culture organization.

Moreover you need to educate the team that falling short is ok! as long as you get back quickly and learn from the past and forge ahead. Because the normal tendency of people is the Fear Factor i.e. what if I fail? well, it is a tough question to answer, but let me put it this way, as long as you did your best and it failed, it does not matter. All the team has to do is learn from the mistakes and forge ahead! That is the key!

Many have defined leadership in terms of their own perspective. This is a novel attempt to redefine Leadership in my own terms.

-Ramesh-
About the Author More details about the author is available at his website

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=RameshKumarThiagarajan
http://EzineArticles.com/?Leadership--an-Art,-is-it?&id=156193